Topic: Blog

Employer’s Aggressive Fight for Clients Backfires, Court Awards Damages for Defamation of Departed Employee

January 22, 2020 Topics: Blog, Defamation
Alberta Computers.com v. Thibert, 2019 ABQB 964 The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench awards $60,000 in damages against an employer that defamed its former employee while attempting to dissuade the local business community from doing business with him. One of the first byproducts of a key employee’s departure often is…
Read More

Is Consideration Still Necessary to Enforce Restrictive Covenants? A Consideration of the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s Decision in Rosas v. Toca

September 28, 2019 Topics: Blog, Consideration, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Solicit Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants
The British Columbia Court of Appeal radically altered the law of consideration last year in Rosas v. Toca. The Court held that, absent duress, unconscionability or other public policy concerns, a mid-contract variation will be enforceable as long as the parties agree to the variation. Against Rosas stand judicial presumptions of an inequality…
Read More

Court Rejects Plea for Disgorgement of Profits, Despite Finding Departing Physicians Breached Fiduciary Duty and Duty of Confidence

April 28, 2019 Topics: Blog, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Confidential Documents, Disgorgement of Profits, Physicians
Genesis Fertility Centre Inc. v. Yuzpe, 2019 BCSC 233 A decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court rejects a claim for disgorgement of profits, even though the Defendants committed breaches of fiduciary duty and confidence. The decision is a reminder that, in employee competition cases, the courts will be mindful…
Read More

Former Telus Executive Escapes Non-Compete due to “Overzealous Drafting”, but Rebuked for Pursuing Termination Payment while Negotiating New Employment with Competitor

January 26, 2019 Topics: Blog, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants
Telus Communications Inc. v. Golberg, 2018 BCSC 1825 A battle between corporate titans Telus Communications and Rogers Media highlights the danger of “overzealous drafting” of restrictive covenants, which enabled a former Telus executive to compete against his former employer. At the same time, the Supreme Court of British Columbia rebukes…
Read More

Employee’s Non-Competition Covenant Attached to Share Purchase Attracts Rigorous Interpretation.

October 3, 2018 Topics: Blog, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Sale of a Business
961945 Alberta Ltd (Servicemaster of Edmonton Disaster Restoration) v Meyer, 2018 ABQB 564, 2018 ABQB 564 The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench holds that even where the evidence did not support an imbalance of bargaining power, the more rigorous approach to interpreting restrictive covenants was warranted in respect of a…
Read More

Valuable Employee? Yes. Fiduciary Employee? Not So Much.

June 19, 2018 Topics: Blog, Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jetco Heavy Duty Lighting v. Fonteyne, 2018 ABQB 345 The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench cautions against conflating a valuable employee with a fiduciary employee, given the onerous obligations placed on fiduciaries. The decision underscores the importance of securing a reasonable restrictive covenant if an employer wishes to protect its…
Read More

The Perils in Drafting Restrictive Covenants and the Importance of Context

April 18, 2018 Topics: Blog, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Sale of a Business
Ceridian Dayforce Corporation v. Daniel Wright (2017 ONSC 6763),853947 B.C. Ltd. v. Source Office Furniture & Systems Ltd. (2016 BCSC 2233) A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice refusing to enforce a non-competition clause highlights the many ways in which the drafter of a restrictive covenant can go too…
Read More

Less is More – “Loyalty Incentives” Upheld

May 29, 2015 Topics: Blog, Loyalty Incentives, Restrictive Covenants
Canada’s big five banks and the financial planning industry will benefit by paying close attention to the difference between a “loyalty incentive” and a restraint of trade, as canvassed thoroughly by the Ontario Superior Court in Levinsky v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2013 ONSC 5657. Levinsky, a managing director with TD Securities Inc.,…
Read More

Arguing Ambiguities in Restrictive Covenants – The Pendulum Swings Back to Enforceability

May 28, 2015 Topics: Blog, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants
One of the most-used strategies to argue that a non-compete or non-solicit provision is unenforceable is to point to any possible ambiguity in the wording used. In the leading Canadian decision, the Supreme Court of Canada held in J.G. Collins Insurance Agencies Ltd. v. Elsley Estate, 1978 CanLII 7 (SCC), that in order…
Read More

Economic Disincentives to Compete Found to be Restraints of Trade

May 24, 2015 Topics: Blog, Loyalty Incentives, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants
The B.C. Court of Appeal’ decision last year in Rhebergen v. Creston Veterinary Clinic, 2014 BCCA 97, is both a win and a loss for employers seeking to restrain employees from competing with them post-employment. In both instances, the decision will have long-reaching effects over employer’s strategies to implement effective restraints and the…
Read More